Аннотация
Данная работа является продолжением ряда работ по исследованию влияния условий социального взаимодействия (соревнования или сотрудничества) на мозговые корреляты вербальной творческой деятельности. В работе рассматривается модель сотрудничества, в которой участникам ставилась задача вместе, хотя и не совещаясь, придумать как можно больше ответов в творческом и нетворческом заданиях. Испытуемые (4 мужчин, 26 женщин) выполняли два типа заданий индивидуально и в условиях сотрудничества в парах (мужчина-мужчина, женщина-женщина): творческое – придумать необычное использование повседневного предмета, и нетворческое – перечислить предметы из предложенных категорий. Сравнивали вызванные потенциалы (ВП) в каждом из заданий между условиями сотрудничества и индивидуального выполнения. Условия сотрудничества приводили к уменьшению амплитуды компонента P200 на временном интервале 148-272 мс от начала предъявления стимула как при творческой, так и при нетворческой деятельности, свидетельствуя о снижении внимания к стимулу в условиях социального взаимодействия. При выполнении творческого задания наблюдается бОльшая амплитуда позднего позитивного компонента на интервале 662-1240 мс – в задневисочных и затылочных отведениях, что может отражать активацию височно-теменного соединения, вовлеченного в процессы «понимания другого».
Литература
Hu Y, Pan Y, Shi X, Cai Q, Li X, Cheng X (2018) Inter-brain synchrony and cooperation context in interactive decision making. Biol Psychol 133:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.12.005.
Washburn A, Román I, Huberth M, Gang N, Dauer T, Reid W, Nanou C, Wright M, Fujioka T (2019) Musical Role Asymmetries in Piano Duet Performance Influence Alpha-Band Neural Oscillation and Behavioral Synchronization. Front Neurosci 13:1088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01088.
Nagornova ZV, Shemyakina NV (2023) Impact of Competitive Conditions on Amplitudes of Event-Related Potentials during Verbal Creative and Noncreative Task Performance. J Evol Biochem Phys 59:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022093023010039
Rice K, Redcay E (2016) Interaction matters: A perceived social partner alters the neural processing of human speech. Neuroimage 129:480–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.041
Czeszumski A, Eustergerling S, Lang A, Menrath D, Gerstenberger M, Schuberth S, Schreiber F, Rendon ZZ, König P (2020) Hyperscanning: A Valid Method to Study Neural Inter-brain Underpinnings of Social Interaction. Front Hum Neurosci 14:39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00039.
Lindenberger U, Li SC, Gruber W, Müller V (2009) Brains swinging in concert: cortical phase synchronization while playing guitar. BMC Neurosci. 10:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-22
Sänger J, Müller V, Lindenberger U (2012) Intra- and interbrain synchronization and network properties when playing guitar in duets. Front Hum Neurosci 6:312. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00312
Shemyakina NV, Nagornova ZV (2021) Neurophysiological Characteristics of Competition in Skills and Cooperation in Creativity Task Performance: A Review of Hyperscanning Research. Hum Physiol 47:87–103. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119721010126
Lu K, Xue H, Nozawa T, Hao N (2019) Cooperation Makes a Group be More Creative. Cereb Cortex 29:3457–3470. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy215
Guilford JP (1967) The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Vigário RN (1997) Extraction of ocular artifacts from EEG using independent component analysis. EEG and Clin Neurophysiol 103:395–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00042-8
Jung TP, Makeig S, Humphries C, Lee TW, McKeown MJ, Iragui V, Sejnowski TJ (2000) Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 37: 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3720163
Tereshchenko EP, Ponomarev VA, Kropotov YuD, Müller A (2009) Comparative efficiencies of different methods for removing blink artifacts in analyzing quantitative electroencephalogram and event-related potentials. Hum Physiol 35:241–247. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119709020157
Greenhouse SW, Geisser S (1959) On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24: 95–112.
Danko SG, Shemyakina NV, Nagornova ZV, Starchenko MG (2009) Comparison of the effects of the subjective complexity and verbal creativity on EEG spectral power parameters. Hum Physiol 35:381–383. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119709030153
Green AE, Kraemer DJ, Fugelsang JA, Gray JR, Dunbar KN (2012) Neural correlates of creativity in analogical reasoning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 38:264–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025764
Silvia PJ, Beaty RE, Nusbaum EC, Eddington KM, Kwapil TR (2014) Creative motivation: creative achievement predicts cardiac autonomic markers of effort during divergent thinking. Biol Psychol 102:30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.07.010.
Lijffijt M, Lane SD, Meier SL, Boutros NN, Burroughs S, Steinberg JL, Moeller FG, Swann AC (2009) P50, N100, and P200 sensory gating: relationships with behavioral inhibition, attention, and working memory. Psychophysiology 46:1059–1068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00845.x.
Boustani N, Pishghadam R, Shayesteh S (2021) Multisensory Input Modulates P200 and L2 Sentence Comprehension: A One-Week Consolidation Phase. Front Psychol 12:746813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.746813.
Sun L, Chen H, Zhang C, Cong F, Li X, Hämäläinen T (2022) Decoding brain activities of literary metaphor comprehension: An event-related potential and EEG spectral analysis. Front Psychol 13:913521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913521
Van Overwalle F, Baetens K (2009) Understanding others' actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: a meta-analysis. Neuroimage 48:564–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.009
Vogeley K (2017) Two social brains: neural mechanisms of intersubjectivity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 372:20160245. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0245.
Heleven E, Van Overwalle F (2018) The neural basis of representing others' inner states. Curr Opin Psychol 23:98–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.003
Eddy CM (2016) The junction between self and other? Temporo-parietal dysfunction in neuropsychiatry. Neuropsychologia 89:465–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.030
Park J, Kim H, Sohn JW, Choi JR, Kim SP (2018) EEG Beta Oscillations in the Temporoparietal Area Related to the Accuracy in Estimating Others' Preference. Front Hum Neurosci 12:43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00043.
Babiloni F, Astolfi L, Cincotti F, Mattia D, Tocci A, Tarantino A, Marciani M, Salinari S, Gao S, Colosimo A, De Vico Fallani F (2007) Cortical activity and connectivity of human brain during the Prisoner's dilemma: an EEG hyperscanning study. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007:4953–4956. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4353452
Astolfi L, Cincotti F, Mattia D, De Vico Fallani F, Salinari S, Vecchiato G, Toppi J, Wilke C, Doud A, Yuan H, He B, Babiloni F (2010) Imaging the social brain: multi-subjects EEG recordings during the "Chicken's game". Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010:1734–1737. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626708.
Bazanova OM, Коndratenko AV, Кuz'minova OI, Muravleva KB, Petrova SE (2013) Cognitive efficiency and psychoemotional tension in the various menstrual cycle phases [In Russ] Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova 99:820–829.
Yamazaki M, Tamura K (2017) The menstrual cycle affects recognition of emotional expressions: an event-related potential study. F1000Res 6:853. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11563.1.
Mulligan EM, Nelson BD, Infantolino ZP, Luking KR, Sharma R, Hajcak G (2018) Effects of menstrual cycle phase on electrocortical response to reward and depressive symptoms in women. Psychophysiology 55:e13268. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13268
Sellitto M, Kalenscher T (2022) Variations in progesterone and estradiol across the menstrual cycle predict generosity toward socially close others. Psychoneuroendocrinology 140:105720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105720